Home » Latest Technology » Xolo Q900 review

Xolo Q900 review

         

Xolo is working exhausting, seeking to make a reputation for itself within the finances aware market. The corporate is flooding the market with its mid-vary goodphones in an strive to provide a bit of one thing for everybody.

Xolo Q900 is the newest mid-vary providing, powered by means of MTK6589 chipset with 4 Cortex A7 cores clocked at 1.2 GHz and the PowerVR SGX544 GPU.

Unboxing

The retail packaging of Xolo Q900 comes with the same old set of forms, USB cable, headset and an A/C adapter. Xolo has additionally bundled a display shield to offer protection to the show from scratches and nicks.

Design

The Xolo Q900 features a simple design with the glossy plastic running all over the device. The aluminum frame of the front panel adds a dash of elegance and the smartphone looks a lot better than many other in its price range.The front of the phone could have looked even better, had it not featured such large bezels.

On the back is the 8 megapixel primary camera with LED flash. The camera has an unusual bump around it that might even cause scratches to the sensor when kept on a table. The speaker grille is at the bottom left. The SIM-card slots, micro SD slot and a 1,800mAh battery is located underneath the back panel.

The power button is located on the right side of the device and the volume rockers are on the left. At the top we find the 3.5mm audio jack and the USB port.

Display

Xolo Q900 sports a 4.7-inch display with a resolution of 720 x 1280 pixels. The screen is quite sharp with a pixel density of 312ppi and its color rendering is quite pleasing.

The brightness is also good, but the viewing angles are far from spectacular. There is just too much of contrast loss and color shift when viewing the display from different angles. The overall image quality is satisfactory, but we believe Xolo could have done a lot better in this department.

User Interface

The Q900 runs on Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean OS and comes with a fair share of software customizations from Xolo. Most of the time, the device runs smoothly with the help of the quad-core CPU and 1 GB of RAM. However, on a few occasions when we tried to multi-task we encountered lag and had to reboot our unit.

Xolo has made an attempt to enhance the batter life of its smartphone with is Xolo Power app. The power management app has a very simple user interface and gives you the remaining battery level, temperature of the smartphone’s battery, estimation hours of usage left if for certain activities and data on the CPU usage.

The second bit of home-backed software comes in form of a security app. The Xolo Secure can be used for protect your device in case you misplace it or it gets stolen. The app also allows you to back up your personal data to the cloud. To activate the app, you would require to login with your Google account and provide the necessary permissions.

You can then configure Anti-Theft options, which allows you to remotely track your device, wipe data, secure lock, secretly capture photo and a few other similar useful features.

There is also a Firewall option that offers to monitor your calls and SMS. You can add unwanted numbers to the black list and intercept all the spam calls.

Synthetic Benchmarks

Next up we decided to check how the Xolo Q900 fares when it comes to synthetic performance. The quad-core Cortex-A7 CPU is not exactly a benchmark champion, but it usually does more than reasonable for its price range.

We started with a single-core performance test with the Benchmark Pi. The Q900 punched above its weight with a healthy score of 388.

Benchmark Pi

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    166
  • Sony Xperia Z
    264
  • HTC Butterfly
    266
  • Oppo Find 5
    267
  • HTC One X+
    280
  • LG Optimus G
    285
  • HTC One mini
    293
  • Samsung Galaxy Express
    346
  • Xolo Q900
    388
  • Sony Xperia M
    400
  • Lenovo P780
    407
  • Samsung Galaxy S II Plus
    409
  • Sony Xperia L
    435
  • Gigabyte GSmart Maya M1 v2
    488
  • Samsung Galaxy S III mini
    499
  • Sony Xperia go
    543
  • HTC Desire 600 dual sim
    554
  • Samsung Galaxy Core
    578
  • HTC Desire X
    639
  • Sony Xperia E dual
    800
  • Samsung Galaxy Young
    831

Next up was the AnTuTu benchmark, which aims to test the overall performance of the smartphone. As expected, the smartphone found itself in the middle of the mid-range pack, surrounded mostly by handsets with the same chipset.

AnTuTu

Higher is better

  • HTC One
    22678
  • Sony Xperia Z
    20794
  • Oppo Find 5
    15167
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    14518
  • Lenovo P780
    13611
  • Xolo Q900
    13292
  • Gigabyte GSmart Maya M1 v2
    13216
  • HTC Butterfly
    12631
  • HTC One mini
    11434
  • HTC Desire 600 dual sim
    11203
  • Sony Xperia M
    9902
  • Sony Xperia L
    9746
  • Nokia Lumia 620
    9140
  • Samsung Galaxy Core
    7408
  • Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
    6650

Last up was the browsing performance test with the vallamo app. The Q900 did quite well here and it even managed to beat the Optimus G 2012 flagship – not bad.

Vellamo

Higher is better

  • Sony Xperia SP
    2497
  • HTC One
    2382
  • HTC One mini
    2252
  • Sony Xperia Z
    2189
  • Samsung Galaxy S4
    2060
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    2019
  • HTC Butterfly
    1866
  • Sony Xperia M
    1800
  • Sony Xperia L
    1640
  • HTC Desire 600 dual sim
    1572
  • LG Optimus 4X HD
    1568
  • Xolo Q900
    1563
  • LG Optimus G
    1522
  • Gigabyte GSmart Maya M1 v2
    1471
  • Lenovo P780
    1452
  • Samsung Galaxy Core
    1366
  • Nexus 4
    1310
  • Samsung Galaxy Fame
    1234
  • Samsung Galaxy Young
    1072
  • Sony Xperia E dual
    1065

Camera

The camera interface is pretty simple and the settings menu has three tabs. All the general settings like the exposure bias, color effect, scene mode and white balance are in the first tab, while all the specific stills and video capturing options are organized under the other two.

You can also select different shooting modes like HDR, Panorama, multi angle view image, macro and many other such options from the bar running on the left side of the interface.

We took a few samples from the 8 megapixel camera of the Q900, but the image quality really left us disappointed. The color rendering is good, which perhaps is the only good thing. The resolved detail is really low and the dynamic range of the images is very limited, while the noise levels are pretty high. A pretty dreadful shooter overall and you are better off browsing its images only on the display of the phone.

Conclusion

Xolo Q900 is at the moment to be had for a price ticket of $200 and the handset is indubitably one of the crucial fascinating deals on the above value vary. The MediaTek processor powering the sensiblephone just isn’t the perfect out there, however the chip ensures first rate efficiency for almost all of the time, which is what par for the path within the mid-vary sector.

On the other hand, the software on the Q900 is a ways from being excellent and has a fair proportion of bugs, which additionally has a bad impact on the general consumer expertise of the device. Xolo has to up its recreation with enhancements and be sure that the device fulfills its possible. We weren’t actually impressed with the camera both and Xolo has received some work to do on this division.

Total, for a sensiblephone that includes a sub $200 price ticket, the Q900 shouldn’t be an actual stand out performer. Having mentioned that, the swish design and twin-SIM capabilities are sure to win it just a few fanatics who’re extra into phone than good.

Execs

• Graceful design
• microSD slot
• Twin-SIM functionality
• Efficiency regularly very clean

Cons

• Reasonable camera
• Low interior storage
• Instrument is moderately buggy